In 2020, corona infection began in Japan, where Abenomics is growing economically.

In Abe’s reign, numerous extrajudicial decisions were made. Abe denies it, but causes many problems. Only by the surface, due to the unreasonable transfer of national land to Mrs. Abe’s friend (the problem of Moritomo Gakuen), the minutes forgery of the minutes, the preferential treatment of the rights of the new university to Abe’s friend (the problem of Kake Gakuen), and the national expense to the supporters. Party (meeting to see cherry blossoms), antisocial forces invitation, destruction of evidence problem, extension of appointment beyond the law of prosecutor in close relationship (Kurokawa’s problem) and disposal invalidation problem (Kurokawa disposal class reduction instruction problem), Such. As a result of the long term of office of the Prime Minister, despite the Japanese law, he became the king of the kingdom by the method of “changing the interpretation of law.” In Japan, which should be a law-abiding country, subordinates, such as bureaucrats, do “moderateness” in search of benefits, and Abe gives a reward in response. It is a capitalist and a law-abiding country, but the reality is that it is a dictatorial Communist state. Especially noticeable is the practice of not evaluating man-hours. There is little interest in working hours. Even today, the evaluation of the need for logistics is low. This is the same as the troops of the Japanese Imperial Army in the war 70 years ago. In Japan, the evolution of management has stopped. Rather, under Abenomics it may be significantly degenerate. Japanese education also has common problems. Of course, these are domestic issues, so there is no adverse effect on developed countries. Therefore, there is no international criticism of Abe unless the ILO or WTO cares.

Abenomikuni was founded.

In such Japan, CORVID-19 invaded.

Abe said he once quarantine SARS and MARS’perfectly ‘. However, this time, the barrier was broken. But that is a well-anticipated, not a problem. What should be noted is Abe’s actions for the subsequent situation. Having experienced two infectious diseases, at best, Abe should be prepared for the recurrence. The preparation status can be confirmed when the virus invades.

You are listening to Abe’s policies. And it’s a mystery that it’s not reasonably tied to results. Western political scientists and epidemics researchers will take it as a mystery. But it’s mysterious because you can’t detect the facts in between. Abe will tell that he has responded perfectly. But he does not explain the scientific rationale for his behavior. This is a mystery.

In the world, especially in scientific countries, it was predicted that the spread of infection would occur during crisis management actions. Then, a scenario for responding to various expected events was prepared. However, there may not have been such a prepared scenario in a country that responded perfectly to the two infectious diseases. Countermeasures were devised and evaluated sequentially, requiring individual decisions and permits for implementation. There seems to be no single plan in Japan.

It’s already half a year since the beginning of this year. Abe also took some measures. But how many plans have been completed at this point? The distribution of AbenoMask remains at 20% achievement and consumes additional budget, time and labor for quality inspection. For the benefit, the work is stopped due to a flaw in the computer program. This is because it was designed as a program that requires human intervention. The design idea that causes this is a wrong idea 50 years ago.

When investigating Japanese infection control policies, you should list what Abe did. And on that list, first, Abe’s readiness should be evaluated. Next, look for Abe’s creativity. Investigate whether Abe was responsible for what only a country could do. Evaluate the cost of each business, not the total budget. Investigate the time series of achievement levels, not the business execution instructions. Investigate the dependency of Abe on the people.

Abenomics is also mysterious.

The actual situation is probably the same as the CORVID-19 measures.

Applying common capitalist and law-abiding criteria when assessing Japanese policy, and especially when analyzing the economy, leads to misleading.

The reason why infection control looks different from that in Western Europe is that a business that is different from Abe’s actions throws the Japanese people’s private assets for the Japanese people and the It is necessary to consider the possibility that the project is being implemented.

At present, Japan is on the brink of a medical crisis that is different from that of the West. As a result of burdening the private sector, the salaries of medical workers have been reduced, the management of hospitals has deteriorated, the maintenance of medical equipment and equipment has become low, and the working environment has deteriorated. This situation is ongoing. However, Abe will not invest money to support hospital management. At this time, they are considering lending money to hospitals. The more aggressive the hospital is at Corona, the worse it is. Nevertheless, medical institutions still have to purchase the materials themselves. As it is, Japan will overtake summer and enter a new winter again. In Japan, medical institutions often go out of business due to business pressure, which may lead to an increase in mortality due to the medical collapse.

However, the Japanese people think about themselves. We’ve had a lot of experience in the past that states waste their taxes. Therefore, prevent infection at your own discretion. It’s almost 100 years ago against infectious diseases.

But you can easily predict the future of the Japanese economy. These can lead to economic collapse in Japan. Companies, like hospitals, have large debt. Business suffers a great deal of damage in the future. For the time being, the economy will stagnate. And business closure will increase. This causes Abe to reduce tax revenue. The number of civil servants is being cut and salaries are being cut. Companies also lose international competitiveness. These could lead to a sudden fall of the international post in the Japanese economy.

Of course, other than the Japanese government, they may behave wisely. They may take the risk of having their headquarters in Japan. They may address the risk of having a production base in Japan. Japan’s biggest problem is that Japan cannot escape from Japan or its government.

What future will Abenomikuni, which thrives in Abenomics, head for? And whose power drives it? The economy of the mysterious country of the Far East may be quite special. Is it suitable for research?